30-10-2018
07:03
Why is marking still a huge issue?
Reflecting on the results of his recent Twitter poll, Mr Goulds asks why marking is still such a big issue and suggests that there are alternatives to our current marketing attitudes.
I recently did my first Twitter poll based around what is the biggest bit of unnecessary work as a teacher and 2,000 people voted. Which made me happy.
Then I looked at the results. 55% of the votes were regarding marking. Still. Marking is still an issue. *Sigh*
I bang on about marking. A lot. My school have worked incredibly hard to reduce the time needed for marking whilst simultaneously increasing the effect that our feedback as a teacher has on the teaching and learning. But it feels like a lot of schools are still quite content to plod along triple marking/quality marking/ deep marking every piece of work. For what purpose? I would put my mortgage on the answer being something to do with Ofsted.
A while ago I wrote about our marking policy and to be fair to it, it got a lot of attention, a lot of messages asking about it, people wanting to borrow it to suggest it for their school. But I have no idea if it was accepted by SLT. If they bit the bullet and binned the highlighters. But over 1,000 people replied saying marking so still we need things to change.
A realistic marking policy:
Doesn’t need highlighters. Pink for think and green for good or the other way around depending on where you live it seems. No. Tick the good bits, correct the bad bits.
Next steps: should be the next lesson. You mark. Ask child question or for further explanation. They answer and then you mark their answer? Really? Why? Literally, why? If you have a question to ask them, ask them. Suggest a change, teach them to spell a word, remind themof the existence of full stops. Just tell them and then see if they do it in the next lesson. If they don’t, you’re looking at some same day intervention with your fantastic TA who is now a dab hand at short, snappy interventions because you do them constantly to plug gaps before they become chasms.
Increase peer/self marking.
At the end of every Literacy unit, after we’ve competed our piece of writing, I have a scan through and the next lesson my class (year 1s and 2s) come up with a colour coded self assessment for things we should have used in our writing. Subordination would be underlined in green. Adverbs in blue. TIP: Don’t use yellow. Doesn’t show up well on the board and looks hideous in books. You’re welcome). So off thet go with their pencil crayons and they underline what they spot in their work that’s good. Then underneath afterwards they write a little sentence about something they could use more of next time. Scale that up to year 6. I’m not saying don’t look at the work but let the children do the heavy lifting.
Does everything need to be marked?
In year 1, especially in our Topic curricula, there are a lot of sorting objectives. Conditions in old and new hospitals in the time of Florence Nightingale and such like. Does it need marking? Well done Jimmy. You’ve successfully sorted between the conditions in old and new hospitals. 25 times? My wrist hurts just from thinking about it. It doesn’t need to be marked.
If you can’t get on board with a whole class feedback sheet like we use, where every lesson’s ‘marking’ is written on half an A4 sheet and one of three stamps is used to signify met LO, working towards LO, at least you were in the room, then try some of these suggestions. Make your own life easier.
Suggest these changes to SLT. Be bold and show them whole class feedback sheets like we and @primarypercival use. They’re the future. Show them tweets from Sean Harford at Ofsted outright saying we don’t expect to see a certain type of marking. Fantastic teaching and learning, effective feedback and no one is up until 9pm marking. You now have the autonomy within your school to come up with something that works for you and for your pupils.
Ditch the highlighters. You can do it. Be brave.
